
That is quite emphatic. Maybe now the government will listen. Though Bush is unhappy: Mr. Bush was unhappy with the ruling. "We'll abide by the court's decision. That doesn't mean I have to agree with it," the president said during a press conference in Rome. "It was a deeply divided court, and I strongly agree with those who dissented."
5-4: ALito, Thomas, Scalia and Roberts on the right; Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, SOuter and Kennedy in the majority. Imagine if McCain gets to appoint a Justice.
The Constitution provides that habeas may only be suspended upon invasion or rebellion.
Seems clear. Not enough for Roberts and Scalia: "Today the Court strikes down as inadequate the most generous set of procedural protections ever afforded aliens detained by this country as enemy combatants. The political branches crafted these procedures amidst an ongoing military conflict, after much careful investigation and thorough debate. The Court rejects them today out of hand, without bothering to say what due process rights the detainees possess, without explaining how the statute fails to vindicate those rights, and before a single petitioner has even attempted to avail himself of the law’s operation." —Chief Justice John Roberts writing in dissent. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito joined. Huh?
How di the US get Guantanamo, I've long wondered. By lease, I found out by googling Guantanamo lease.
With the Bush administration moving toward its close and both major candidates for president critical, in different degrees, of the Guantanamo detentions, Thursday's ruling is a blow to the outgoing president's legacy.
Legacy? What legacy? Of failure, arrogance, unilateralism, tilting toward the rich, favoring certain corporate supporters, of lying and deception.
No comments:
Post a Comment