Showing posts with label Churchill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Churchill. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Masters and Commanders

The other new book on the New Book cart at Information Desk today that intrigued me:

It looks at FDR and Churchill (masters) and George C. Marshall and Alan Brooke (American and English generals, commanders). Interesting viewpoint considering the four as principals in the war effort. The author, of course, has his own website.


Why, when the most direct route from Britain to Germany was through north-western France, did the western allies first launch assaults on North Africa, Sicily and Rome? Why, if D-Day was intended to be the start of the Allies’ great thrust into Germany, did four hundred thousand men land five hundred miles to the south, in southern France, two months later? Why did the Allies not take Berlin, Vienna or Prague, and allow the Iron Curtain to descend where it did?

Friday, February 13, 2009

That’s What You Call Investing for the Long Term












Ruby Washington/The New York Times

Lloyd Ultan, the Bronx borough historian, examined an old municipal bond. More Photos »




February 13, 2009
That’s What You Call Investing for the Long Term
By JO CRAVEN McGINTY

Anyone who has failed to keep track of a winning lottery ticket for all of 12 months may want to consider the efforts of 39 bondholders who have been safekeeping valuable, tissue-thin, New York City securities since shortly after the Civil War.

Next month, one of the bonds, issued in 1868 and thought to be one of the oldest active municipal bonds in the country, will come due. And the city stands ready to retire the debt incurred when Winston Churchill’s grandfather came up with the idea of building a road to one of the nation’s first racetracks, which he had opened in what is now the Bronx.

For 135 years, New York City has been dutifully paying 7 percent annual interest on the bonds, which financed construction of the road. On March 1, the owner of one of them is entitled to come forward and collect its face value: $1,000.

The 38 other bondholders have notes that will mature sometime between now and 2147, a mere 138 years away.

“It’s not the best example of municipal debt management,” said Jim Lebenthal, a bond specialist. “But 135 years of payment without missing a beat does underscore the safety record of municipal bonds.”

Although the interest rate on the notes has remained constant, other things have changed. The road, called Central Avenue when it was built, is now known as Jerome Avenue after Churchill’s grandfather, Leonard W. Jerome.

The site of the racetrack, known as Jerome Park and in its day a magnet for all manner of society swells, is now a reservoir.

And the two towns that originally issued the bonds, Morrisania and West Farms, then incorporated villages outside the city limits, no longer exist, which is how New York City ended up holding the bag of debt after annexation.

As generation followed generation, the 100 or so outstanding notes with a combined face value of $66,000 have all but been forgotten, aside from an occasional newspaper account. But the Bank of New York Mellon, which administers the bonds for the city, has a record of the 39 bondholders who own them and has been mailing them interest checks twice a year.

Two of the active bonds are in the Museum of the City of New York, which has held them since 2001. They were a gift from Mr. Lebenthal, who had held them for 30 years after buying them through a broker from the Poughkeepsie Rural Cemetery. The cemetery had gotten them from Martha B. Jones in 1914. She took possession of them in 1881.

City officials declined to identify the other bondholders, citing privacy concerns, so it is hard to say how they have kept track of a flimsy piece of paper that would not pay off for several lifetimes.

But the difficulty of the task can be seen in the fact that city officials can no longer locate the heavy bound ledger in which, in neat Victorian script, their predecessors kept track of the bonds by serial number and purchaser name.

The ledger, which the city displayed as recently as 1980, became superfluous when record keeping for the bonds was transferred to computers.

Not all the ledgers are missing: “We do have some dating back to the early 1900s,” Regina Fleszar, the director of investor relations for the city comptroller, wrote in an e-mail message. “But at the moment cannot find the one containing the 1868 bonds.”

What is known about the bonds is that they were the handiwork of a wily 19th-century financier and a couple of cash-strapped towns that schemed to implement a public work at the expense of their wealthy, gleaming neighbor.

The financier, Mr. Jerome, was a successful Wall Street stock speculator and a pioneer of American thoroughbred racing at a time when harness racing was more popular. To cultivate his hobby, he built the track. To ensure its success, he concocted a plan to lure upper-crust New Yorkers to what was then the suburbs by naming races after them, including the banker and socialite August Belmont (yes, the Belmont Stakes was first run in the Bronx).

“Jerome wanted to bring horse racing back as the sport of kings,” said Lloyd Ultan, the Bronx borough historian. “To do that, he knew he had to attract his wealthy friends to the racetrack. And to do that, he needed a road from the upper part of settled New York — what is now Midtown Manhattan — to where the racetrack was.”

There was a catch: West Farms, where the track was, and Morrisania, which would share the road, could not afford the improvement. So the towns issued bonds, backed by Mr. Jerome, with unusually long maturities, gambling that their rapidly expanding neighbor would soon absorb them, and their debt.

“Everybody knew because of the shift of population northward, it was only a matter of time before the City of New York was going to annex the territory,” Mr. Ultan said. “So they issued these bonds with the date of redemption so far in the future because they figured that once the City of New York annexed their town, then the City of New York would assume the payment of the bonds — which is exactly what happened.”

At its peak, Jerome Park attracted thousands of spectators who traveled by horseback, four-in-hand coach or train to fill the park’s clubhouse, grandstands and the surrounding knolls and bluffs to watch horses pound around the kidney-shaped track. The city condemned the park in 1890 to make room for the Jerome Park Reservoir.

In addition to his fame as financier, sportsman and bon vivant — at one point, he was listed as a “considerable owner” of The New York Times, according to his obituary — Mr. Jerome was known for his three daughters, and particularly for his middle daughter, Jennie.

“She was known as an international beauty, and she did what the daughters of wealthier Americans did in those days,” Mr. Ultan said, marrying the son of an impoverished European aristocrat. “Her son was Winston Churchill.”

Since 2000, the Bank of New York Mellon has administered the bonds for the city. This decade, four of the bonds have matured — one every other March beginning in 2001 — but no one stepped forward to claim the money.

“Our concern when we took over the business was seeing the age of some of the securities,” said Michael Hieb, a vice president of the bank. “We were scratching our heads.”

The typical municipal bond sold currently matures in 30 years.

Today, the city pays the interest on the outstanding bonds for the Bronx road twice a year, on March 1 and Sept. 1, in increments of $35 or $17.50, depending on the denomination of the bonds, which have a face value of $1,000 or $500. The total cost is $4,620 each year.

The city comptroller is not certain how much debt was originally issued through the bonds, but a previous estimate put the figure at $278,000, reflecting the fact that hundreds of bonds were probably sold originally, some of them with shorter maturities. Today, nearly 100 of the bonds, with a face value of $66,000, have yet to mature. By the time they do, the city will have paid out nearly $1 million in interest.

That debt is not large by modern standards, when the city currently borrows about $7 billion a year and has an annual debt service of about $3.7 billion.

But in the early years after the Civil War, when money stretched further, $70 a year in interest was a substantial sum, enough for a down payment on a middle-class house of good construction, which cost about $300.

“People who bought the bonds might say: ‘This is really cool; generations of my family will benefit from this,’ ” said Richard Sylla, a financial historian and a trustee for the Museum of American Finance. “For the issuer, if you don’t have to pay back the principal for 100 or 200 years, that’s an advantage, too.”

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Uncle Joe, the Czar, or the Empress

In the land of Czars, an online poll turns up interesting results.

In the land of Tolstoy and Tchaikovsky, an online poll to identify Russian history's "greatest heroes" has two early front-runners: autocratic Czar Nicholas II and dictator Josef Stalin.
That in itself is interesting: both were strongmen, arbitrary rulers with absolute power, and both, clearly, are objects of nostalgic longing for how things used to be. Of course, the dark side of their rules is forgotten, glossed over, or ignored. Under Nicholas many Russians were serfs, under Stalin many Russians were dead.

Catherine the Great, Yuri Gagarin, Czar Nicolas, Stalin.

But this is interesting: "He's like a brand. It's like Coca-Cola," says Alexander Lyubimov, a senior executive with Rossiya TV, the state-controlled broadcaster behind the "Name of Russia" contest.

A brand? As in 'things go better with Uncle Joe'? Oy vay.
The vote has fired people's imagination at a time when the Kremlin is trying to reclaim parts of its Soviet and Czarist past to forge a new nationalism. But as early results have shown, finding suitable historical heroes in a country with a centuries-old tradition of authoritarianism is complex. Elsewhere, the task was less fraught. In the U.S., a similar contest chose Ronald Reagan; in Britain, Winston Churchill; and in South Africa, Nelson Mandela.

Just goes to show how short-sighted and forgetful Americans can be.

Nicholas II's narrow lead comes as monarchists prepare to mark the 90th anniversary of his execution by the Bolsheviks. Mr. Lyubimov says Russia's last czar is unlikely to win. Though Nicholas II is revered by the Orthodox Church, which canonized him, his detractors say his reign was marred by anti-Semitic pogroms, two disastrous wars, a civilian massacre and the near-collapse of the country.

Seems ole Nick wasn't adept at ruling his nation.

And this summary: For much of the Soviet period, there was little examination of the darker side of his rule. This only began in earnest in the twilight days of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev and in the early 1990s when human-rights groups began talking about Stalin's millions of victims.

Sort of a sound-bit interpretation of history: Khrushchev began the exposure of Stalin's horrors, Solzhenitsyn wrote a great deal about those horrors, and Sakharov and other dissidents continued the movement, yet it is all ascribed to Gorbachev. Too simple.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Gathering Storm


Watched this movie at the weekend, and enjoyed it immensely. What acting! In trying to find out more about Ralph Wigram, I found some documents on the Web: the press release from BBC and a review in the Times.