Showing posts with label Football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Football. Show all posts

Friday, February 5, 2010

An Offensive Tackle Named Shlomo

Alan Veingrad, who played for the Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys, at the Chabad House in Los Angeles.


This is a great story.

 February 6, 2010 - On Religion
An Offensive Tackle Named Shlomo
By SAMUEL G. FREEDMAN


LOS ANGELES — After practice one late-summer day in 1986, Alan Veingrad strode into the Green Bay Packers’ locker room, feeling both spent and satisfied. An undrafted player from an obscure college, he had made the team and then some. On the next Sunday, opening day of the N.F.L. season, he would be starting at offensive tackle.

In his locker, Mr. Veingrad found the usual stuff, his street clothes and sweatsuit and playbook. On a small bench, though, lay a note from the Packers’ receptionist. It carried a name that Mr. Veingrad did not recognize, Lou Weinstein, and a local phone number.

Alone in a new town, too naïve to be wary, Mr. Veingrad called. This Lou Weinstein, it turned out, ran a shoe store in Green Bay, Wis. He had just read an article in the paper about a Jewish player on the Packers, and he wanted to meet and welcome that rarity.

A few days later, Mr. Veingrad joined Mr. Weinstein for lunch at the businessman’s golf club. There Mr. Weinstein invited the player to accompany his family to Rosh Hashana services at Cnesses Israel, a synagogue near the site of the Packers’ original home field, at City Stadium.

It had been a long time since Mr. Veingrad had spent much time in shul, nearly a decade since his bar mitzvah. He knew the date of the Packers’ Monday night game against the Chicago Bears better than he did Yom Kippur. “But when I heard the Hebrew,” he recently recalled of that service in Green Bay, “I felt a pull.”

Maybe it was a presentiment, maybe it was the sort of destiny that Yiddish calls “goyrl.” Whatever the word for it, something stirred into motion. And that something brought Mr. Veingrad into the Chabad House — a Jewish center run by the Lubavitcher Hasidic movement — near the University of Southern California campus here five nights before the 2010 Super Bowl.

A promotional flier announced the evening’s subject as “Super Bowl to Super Jew.” There was truth in that advertising. Mr. Veingrad goes these days by his Hebrew name Shlomo. He wore a black skullcap and the ritual fringes called tzitzit; he wore the Super Bowl ring he won in 1992 with the Dallas Cowboys and the Rolex watch that was a gift from Emmitt Smith, the team’s star running back.

Within his 6-foot-5 frame, Mr. Veingrad embodies two Jewish archtypes that do not often meet. He is the ba’al guf, the Jewish strongman, and the ba’al teshuva, the returnee to the faith. While two Jewish boxers on the scene now — Yuri Foreman and Dimitriy Salita — also are prominently observant, Mr. Veingrad may well be the only Orthodox athlete from America’s hugely popular team sports.

“I believe I played in the N.F.L. and have that ring so I can share my story with other Jews,” Mr. Veingrad, 46, said shortly before the U.S.C. event. During it, he told a spellbound capacity audience, “The Torah is a playbook for how someone can live their life.”

Were Mr. Veingrad a Christian, like virtually all his teammates over the years, such God-talk would be as ordinary as an extra-point kick. With prayer circles at midfield and Bible verses on their eye-black, Christian football players have routinely used their fame for evangelism and witness. One of the major subplots of this year’s Super Bowl is the anti-abortion commercial featuring the college star Tim Tebow.

For Jews, abundant as fans but uncommon as top players, the visibility of a Shlomo Veingrad serves both reassuring and cathartic roles. Having a Jew to root for — whether Hank Greenberg, Sandy Koufax or the Israeli N.B.A. rookie Omri Casspi — “has a lot to do with our desire to define ourselves as Americans in the most American way, which is sports,” said Jeffrey S. Gurock, a history professor at Yeshiva University and the author of “Judaism’s Encounter With American Sports.”

At a deeper and more anxious level, American Jews continue to grapple with the stereotypical view of the Jew as egghead, nerd, weakling. That dismissive portrayal was a staple not only of anti-Semites, but also of early Zionists, who envisioned their “new man” with his plow and rifle as the antidote to the “golus Yid,” the exilic Jew unable even to defend himself.

“I don’t think those feelings are as conscious as in prior generations, but they still have some resonance,” Professor Gurock said in a telephone interview. “So there’s a residual pride of someone achieving in this very secular world of sports.”

The story Mr. Veingrad tells in about 40 speeches a year attests to a ferociously competitive spirit. He started playing high school football as a teenage beanpole in Miami, could only get a scholarship from a Division II school, East Texas State, and was cut by his first two N.F.L. teams.

A full year later, he caught on with the Packers, beginning a six-year career with Green Bay and Dallas. From high school through the pros, he defied the odds with a rigorous program of weight training and a relentless study of technique.

“He was a storybook player,” recalled Rich Moran, a Packers teammate, “the undrafted guy who proves he can play.”

In retirement, Mr. Veingrad brought a comparable focus and intensity to his emerging religious life, which was nurtured by Moshe Gruenstein, an Orthodox rabbi in South Florida, with whom he studied the Torah for eight years, and then by several Chabad rabbis.

Among those who came to hear this saga at Southern California was Spencer Kassimir, a 26-year-old graduate student in East Asian studies.

“I drove all the way to Orange County to get this,” he said, showing Mr. Veingrad an official N.F.L. football. Mr. Veingrad obligingly signed with his name, his uniform number, and his message: “Jewish Pride!”


Mr. Veingrad as a tackle with the Green Bay Packers in 1989.




Alan Shlomo Veingrad, with beard, showing his Super Bowl ring Tuesday to students at the Chabad House in Los Angeles.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Beckham Chiquito

Comprueba lo que pensaba
Manosean a Beckham en "partes nobles"
La conductora italiana Elena Di Cioccio se mostró muy decepcionada con la experiencia que vivió tras tocar los atributos del mediocampista inglés, al asegurar que el jugador del Milán lo tenía chiquito


La conductora italiana Elena Di Cioccio se burló de los atributos de David Beckham después de que tocó en un evento público (Foto: Imagen tomada del video)


Redacción
El Universal
Ciudad de México
Jueves 21 de enero de 2010 | 10:48



El mediocampista inglés David Beckham, quien en la actualidad milita en el Milan de Italia, se topó con una de las escenas más bochornosas de su vida, cuando de la nada la presentadora italiana Elena Di Cioccio decidió tocarle sus partes nobles durante un evento público.

Tras la curiosa escena, el cuerpo de seguridad que resguardaba al futbolista buscó someter a la controversial presentadora, sin embargo no se dejó reprimir e incluso se dio el lujo de seguir al esposo de Victoria Adams hasta su automóvil.

Al ser cuestionada del por qué de su accionar, la mujer argumentó que lo hizo porque quería comprobar que las imágenes que realizaba el ex Galaxy para Armani tenían retoque y que sus atributos no eran de la magnitud que todo el mundo creía, por lo que la única forma de desmentir al astro era tocando sus "partes nobles" y una vez que lo hizo, la conductora tuvo la facultad de confirmar lo que pensaba: David Beckham lo tiene chiquito.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Khakis and Bourbon

Each Sunday, Peyton Alsobrook, a 19-year-old freshman at Auburn University, gets together with his Alpha Tau Omega fraternity brothers to compare notes on the women they take on dates to Saturday football games.

Those who seem bored are eliminated from further consideration, he says, along with any who might talk too much during a close game "because they're from up North or something." As the all-important Alabama game approaches, Mr. Alsobrook says he's narrowed his list of potential dates to four. The winner, he says, will get a coveted ticket to the big game and, beyond that, special treatment that might include candy or even "actual flowers."

As the Southeastern Conference solidifies its place as the most prestigious in college football—it has produced the last three national champions—the profile of its games and the growing scarcity of tickets have taken a toll on some of the most genteel (some might say antiquated) traditions of college football in the deep South. The University of Mississippi has already banned the waving of confederate flags, replaced a mascot that reminds some of a plantation owner and this week told its marching band to stop playing a song that ends with the words "the South will rise again."


Some might, indeed say that waving of confederate flags, replaced a mascot that reminds some of a plantation owner and this week told its marching band to stop playing a song that ends with the words "the South will rise again" is antiquated; I know I do.

Monday, February 2, 2009

Obama picks Steelers

Monday, January 12, 2009

When Life Is Just a Bowl of Freebies

No one knows who will win Thursday night's Bowl Championship Series National Championship game between Florida and Oklahoma. But one thing's for sure: Players on both teams will walk away with some pretty nice swag. That's because the bowls now give out gift bags just like the Oscars. It's one of the few times of the year when college athletes are allowed to accept gifts. And this year, Miami, host to the Orange Bowl and the BCS title game, was the place to be. Players in both bowl games were allowed to stroll through the Sony Suite, an exclusive room at their hotel stocked with Sony Electronics products. Each player had a $300 credit limit. Players picked out the items they wanted, including PlayStations and flat-screen TVs, and Sony shipped them wherever they wanted. Participating schools also typically order extra gift bags for big-donor alumni and other VIPs they bring to the games.

It is self-evident that what matters is money.

Gift bags are just one example of how these bowl games, originally designed to promote tourism, have become multimillion-dollar enterprises in their own right. Revenues for the 34 postseason bowl games range from just over $1 million for the R&L Carriers New Orleans Bowl to more than $30 million for each of the five BCS games. College bowl games are an estimated $400 million-a-year industry, and more than 20 of the bowl games have tax-exempt status.

According to a survey last year by Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, the Chick-fil-A Bowl is the most profitable. This year marked its 12th-straight sell out, generating a roughly $2 million profit on about $12 million in revenue and $10 million in expenses. Revenue has risen more than 70% over the past decade, a marked improvement from the 1990s when the bowl actually lost money. Bowl executives don't do badly either, with most getting six-figure salaries. Based on 2006 tax returns, the Sugar Bowl's Paul Hoolahan makes more than $450,000 a year, the Outback Bowl's Jim McVay nearly $500,000, and Fiesta and Insight Bowl Director John Junker more than $400,000.

Money for everyone, schools included. But, what is the cost?

And while everyone's fretting over the bailout package for the auto industry, most taxpayers would be shocked to learn that they're also footing the bill for some of these highly profitable bowl games. From 2001 to 2005, seven tax-exempt bowls received $21.6 million in government aid. The Sugar Bowl, which in one four-year period got $4.1 million in funding from the Louisiana Department of Economic Development, pays a consultant more than $10,000 a year to "monitor legislative developments . . . related to the continued financial support of the Sugar Bowl." From 2001 to 2005, 38% of the Brut Sun Bowl's total revenue, or about $9 million, came from receipts from a Texas rental-car tax that are diverted into the bowl's bank account.

Yes, the bowls are tax-exempt. Why? Back scratching; also called corruption. But that is not the only cost.

In short, the college bowl games generate some pretty impressive numbers. But Derrick Jackson, a columnist for the Boston Globe, comes up with his own numbers each year: The bowl teams' graduation rates.

"Florida has a 68 percent graduation rate but a 25-percentage-point racial disparity," he wrote in his Dec. 13, 2008, column. "Oklahoma should flat-out be disqualified with a 46 percent graduation rate."

Less than half graduate.

Mr. Jackson also found that four other schools that played in BCS bowl games – Ohio State, Texas, Alabama and Utah – all have black graduation rates under 50% and an average racial gap of 30 percentage points.


Watching the Oklahoma-Florida, game, I saw that Florida's top receiver is majoring in Sports recreational management. O, yes, indeed.

DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM, RECREATION AND SPORT MANAGEMENT
COLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

That is from a course syllabus: LEI 4501: Legal Aspects of Recreation, Parks and Tourism (3 Credits)

The University indeed has a department of Recreational Sports.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Dog-Food Ad to Try a New Trick

Some advertising is indirect; that is, the product itself is soft-pedaled, and a message is the obvious point of the advert. Here is an example of the concept: Pedigree brand dog food will air a commercial in the Super Bowl in February 2009, and the message will be the adoption of dogs. President-elect Obama promised his two daughters that they will get a dog when they all move into the White House.

The picture in the print edition of the Journal shows the entire dog and the full text, which reads: We'd love to help you fulfill your first campaign promise. We are thrilled that you are celebrating your victory by adopting a dog into your family. We think you'll find that shelter dogs are among the most loyal, loving and special dogs in the world. And no dog is more in need of a little hope. You can find a great dog and learn more about responsible adoption at www.DogsRule.com

Goes right for the heart strings. And I found the full picture at the website. The name of the JPEG is ObamaAd.
Pedigree is owned by Mars, Inc., the chocolate company. The third-largest dog-food brand in the U.S., Pedigree held 6.8% of the market in the U.S. last year. The brand trails category leader Hill's Diet Science from Colgate-Palmolive and Procter & Gamble's Iams.

The pet food business has annual sales of $11 billion. Of 229 countries listed (which includes World as #1 and European Union as # 2) in the CIA's online World Fact Book, 142 have a larger GDP than 11 billion dollars. Number 141 is Haiti with an estimated 2007 GDP of $11,380,000,000. Just to put it in perspective. The world's biggest 2007 GDP is listed for the US, at $ 13,780,000,000,000 (nearly 14 trillion dollars). China, Japan, India, Germany, UK, Russia, France, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Canada and South Korea round out the top 16. Number 17, Turkey, does not reach a trillion.

Anyway, dog food.

Using a cause message is a "natural move," says Emily Woon, head of pet-food research at Euromonitor International. "Pet-food companies are still trying to rebuild trust with consumers."

I'd forgotten about the tainted dog food that resulted in a number of pets dying last year.

As for Pedigree's Super Bowl ad, viewers shouldn't expect a sappy ad that tugs on the heartstrings. Instead, the company is going straight for the funny bone -- a staple approach to Super Bowl advertising. Pedigree's commercial, which is being crafted by Omnicom Group's TBWA/Chiat/Day, will show what life would be like if the world didn't have dogs. A string of crazy pets is expected to appear, including an ostrich giving a mailman a hard time. Though the ad won't show dog food, it will feature the Pedigree brand name.

I don't know about that; the pooch is awfully cute.

One branding expert thinks the Super Bowl ad will be well received by viewers. "People are looking for security and love," says Eli Portnoy, who heads the brand-strategy firm Portnoy Group. "No one has any trust left. You can't trust your investment banker, you can't trust the government. But you can trust your dog."

At least we've got that left.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Steelers Are Secretly Shopped

Here is a perfect illustration of sloppy English: if the story states the team is being shopped around, how can it be called a secret?

Inside, the headline of the story is Rooneys Quietly Shop the Steelers, which is better said. Just being a stickler for accuracy, not picayune.

Stanley Druckenmiller, billionaire chairman of Pittsburgh's Duquesne Capital Management, has expressed interest in acquiring the Steelers, people briefed on the negotiations said.
Stanley Druckenmiller was a portfolio manager at Dreyfus when I worked there. He went on to work with George Soros, and they each made a fortune shorting the pound sterling.

The Rooney family's divisions over the future of the Steelers are a classic example of the challenge facing second- and third-generation owners of a family business. Looming estate taxes and diverging interests among the children and grandchildren of the founder raise pressure for a sale, bringing emotional family issues into play.

It's happening with the Anheuser-Busch company now, as well.

The Rooney brothers own 80% of the Steelers through Rooney Enterprises LLC; the McGinley family, their cousins, own 20%. Rooney Enterprises also owns the Yonkers Raceway just north of New York City and its profitable casino; the Palm Beach Kennel Club, a faded Florida dog track that now has a poker room; and other holdings, including a horse farm in Maryland. The Steelers are by far the family's crown jewel. Art Rooney Sr. – a colorful, cigar-chomping sportsman who kept the team going in its early years through his skill as a horse-race handicapper – bought the club for $2,500 in 1933.

Good investment by the patriarch.

After decades of losing, the Steelers became a powerhouse in the 1970s, fielding marquee players such as quarterback Terry Bradshaw and Franco Harris.

If Bradshaw's position is spelled out, shouldn't Harris's be also spelled out?